Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:47:57 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Gregg T. Geiger" <gt DOT geiger AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
Message-Id: <7458-Sun31Dec2000094757+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <NdH26.7955$bU.573105@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
	(gt DOT geiger AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
Subject: Re: DJGPP Developement
References: <PAw26.163808$_5 DOT 36727858 AT news4 DOT rdc1 DOT on DOT home DOT com> <NdH26.7955$bU DOT 573105 AT bgtnsc04-news DOT ops DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Gregg T. Geiger" <gt DOT geiger AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 13:28:13 GMT
> 
> I'm afraid the GNU/DJGPP compiler is becoming rather obsolete as
> more and more developers strive to write Standard-compliant code.

???  This is a compiler issue, not a DJGPP issue.  As long as GCC
tracks the C and C++ standards, so is DJGPP, since we use the latest
versions of GCC and libstdc++.