From: naisbodo <naisbodo AT enteract DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: strftime: Need Help with Time Offsets
Date: 22 Dec 2000 01:51:59 GMT
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <91uc3v$c3g$1@bob.news.rcn.net>
References: <1a524t0tk28cmv3vqfq26tooe0qeikhgm5 AT 4ax DOT com> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1001221110346 DOT 28580O-100000 AT is> <ku454tke181c70f6rimuamfd2pc9p0blfk AT 4ax DOT com>
X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVZLhWO0ZzoyNDzBnCAAdj6FfU18yLkngns15jeGlQ10U0uhRe3lOr58
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rcn DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Dec 2000 01:51:59 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Jason Green <news AT jgreen4 DOT fsnet DOT co DOT uk> wrote:
> Of course, %z can be made to do whatever we want. 

More realistically, it should allow existing programs to work without
modification.  There are two cases of existing programs:

   * Programs which must be ported and rely on a standard behavior
   * Programs which are on DJGPP already and rely on existing behavior

Which is more significant in this case?  Is there a way to support both
behaviors if both are important?

> So if you think it should do something else please say so and I will 
> try to code for that.  

http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html

> Maybe you have a copy of the ANSI standard to check on this?  (I do
> not have a copy here).

Which ANSI standard?  C99 refers to ISO 8601 on %z, which says HHMM,
while %Z is implementation-defined.  This question would best be
asked on comp.lang.c.

-- 
naisbodo AT enteract DOT com