From: "mike friedrichs" <mike_fr1 AT txucom DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: dos extenders
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 17:03:59 -0600
Organization: LCC Internet
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <91u2f8$h04@atlas.lcc.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: conr-ddas5-a30.txucom.net
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Readers,

this query to sort out facts, not to start flames.

the final product will be ported an eeprom or flash for embedded
applications with a TCP/IP stack, using serial interface versus ethernet.

I'm investigating the pro's and con's of '3' 32 bit dos extenders;
tenberry(dos/4g), pharlap(TNT-realtime), and djgpp. I've built the same,
fairly, simple program on all '3' and all work well.

the obvious difference I see with djgpp is the complete development system
is packaged as '1' part; libraries, IDE, compiler, debugger, etc. where the
other '2'  vendors are using parts from other vendors. for me it's watcom or
Microsoft.

and djgpp is free, but paying a fair market price for good software is not a
problem for me.

besides what I have mentioned, what are the other advantages with djgpp ?

thanks,
mike friedrichs