Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 08:53:12 -0500
Message-Id: <200011291353.IAA24265@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
CC: salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.A41.4.05.10011290923160.107258-100000@ieva06.lanet.lv>
	(message from Andris Pavenis on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:29:10 +0200 (WET))
Subject: Re: Is anyone still actively developing RHIDE?  Is the latest version
 Pavenis's modified 1.4.7.5?
References:  <Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10011290923160 DOT 107258-100000 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> It could be nice. But I think it should be only usefull if Salvador will
> also put port of TVision and Setedit there. I think it would be best to
> have common CVS tree for all these 3 packages.

My point was that, if a CVS repository is needed for a djgpp-related
project, I've got one.  I don't mind hosting DJGPP projects here.

> In this case we should also have the possibility to put binary files in
> CVS (RHIDE project files, some object libraries inside source distribution 
> of Setedit)

That's not a problem.