Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:29:10 +0200 (WET)
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
cc: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Is anyone still actively developing RHIDE?  Is the latest version
 Pavenis's modified 1.4.7.5?
In-Reply-To: <200011281759.MAA13600@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.10011290923160.107258-100000@ieva06.lanet.lv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, DJ Delorie wrote:

> 
> > Or better yet, put it into CVS on SourceForge :-)
> 
> Or CVS on cvs.delorie.com, of course ;-)
> 

It could be nice. But I think it should be only usefull if Salvador will
also put port of TVision and Setedit there. I think it would be best to
have common CVS tree for all these 3 packages.

In this case we should also have the possibility to put binary files in
CVS (RHIDE project files, some object libraries inside source distribution 
of Setedit)

Andris