From: Julian Hsiao <madoka AT novastar DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DJGPP and Borland's compiler generated code size
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 18:28:41 -0500
Organization: Carnegie Mellon University
Message-ID: <madoka-65FF9E.18284112112000@news.supernews.com>
Distribution: world
References: <madoka-6C398A DOT 16411011112000 AT news DOT supernews DOT com> <ddlr0tknefk6eqhid2b1vrmgc5pji3aus7 AT 4ax DOT com>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC)
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse AT supernews DOT com
Lines: 16
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <ddlr0tknefk6eqhid2b1vrmgc5pji3aus7 AT 4ax DOT com>, Damian Yerrick 
<Bullcr_pd_yerrick AT hotmail DOT comRemoveBullcr_p> wrote:

>But why are you concerned about exe size anyway?  Do you have to fit
>several binaries onto a single floppy?  If so, avoid duplicating libc
>by combining several programs' function into one program.

I see, so the code is basically distributed into other files in 
Borland's compiler's case.  The only reason I asked is really out of 
curiosity ^_^  I have a 2+ GB hard drive, and assignments are submitted 
online (which is code only anyway, no binaries).

Thanks.

Julian Hsiao
madoka AT novastar DOT com