Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:13:45 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Krish Karthik <krishkarthik AT softhome DOT net>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Gprof docs
In-Reply-To: <39f3bec1.787246@news.vsnl.net.in>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001023141031.13851R-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Krish Karthik wrote:

> it seems that the docs for gprof are not present in the binaries of
> binutils 2.10.

More accurately, the file gprof.info is there, but the files gprof.i1 and 
gprof.i2, which are ``the meat'', are absent.

> I wonder why nobody noticed this.

Probably because most people who read the docs still have the old 
gprof.i[12] files on their disks...