From: Damian Yerrick <Bullcr_pd_yerrick AT hotmail DOT comRemoveBullcr_p>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: qsort's algorithm
Organization: Pin Eight Software  http://pineight.8m.com/
Message-ID: <tf4qusk3quottc52jj9cmuhmqlvk48cgm7@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 11
X-Trace: /wsFGz/o+fdcMDq1vTba1SuRhFpn0LLL+Cq7IOIGuVo+3L9Qi1RGMRGsk44JPBxm0Pbf2spSF5a4!lyerpFzvZvlbfGBLkhZVvLTLTDfQWkJ4mh0sVviHPhDC4XbEy7u8oYgMKzrg3H5tXUkW4SO2cREN!BTJgSQ==
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT gte DOT net
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 03:02:12 GMT
Distribution: world
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 03:02:12 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

From what I understand of the C standard, qsort() can use any decent
sorting algorithm.  Does DJGPP libc's qsort() have bad performance on
already sorted data?

-- 
<O
( \   GNOME vs. KDE: the game!
 X    http://pineight.8m.com/nes.htm

This is McAfee VirusScan. Add these two lines to your signature to
prevent the spread of signature viruses.  http://www.mcafee.com/