Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:44:41 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Message-Id: <9003-Tue10Oct2000224441+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5h In-reply-to: (message from Damian Yerrick on Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:04:14 GMT) Subject: Re: Memory amount and PMODE References: <20001008141510 DOT 8288 DOT qmail AT idisys DOT iae DOT nsk DOT su> <39e05b5e DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <8rse5f$16q7$1 AT news DOT itfs DOT nsk DOT su> <39e1fec6 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <39e2edb0 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: Damian Yerrick > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp > Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:04:14 GMT > > >With the new addition of a CWSDPMI embedded stub: > >Linked in is the wrong term - it's built into the stub which can be > >built separately and upgraded separately from the application. The > >stub copyright is very lenient - it say use for any purpose as long > >as the copyright is intact. CWSDPMI built into that stub has the > >same terms as the other binaries. Note: this does prevent compressing > >the stub and/or CWSDPMI since copyrights are removed/obscured. > > OUCH! UPX dies. Doesn't UPX replace the stub with its own one, which includes the decompressor? If so, this is not a new problem, is it?