From: Damian Yerrick Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Memory amount and PMODE Organization: Pin Eight Software http://pineight.8m.com/ Message-ID: References: <20001008141510 DOT 8288 DOT qmail AT idisys DOT iae DOT nsk DOT su> <39e05b5e DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <8rse5f$16q7$1 AT news DOT itfs DOT nsk DOT su> <39e1fec6 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <39e2edb0 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 36 X-Trace: /bCCZHP/5BDge3yC8pMSsDY1mzbepCwSlIkYmwSWgA9Vt7bZIXiv7z6tHV1fDiXc8WwalGks8hWZ!Z4eEIp4UgUm2RLvp9wrDZJhZb9hP2cRaVlhGsy33lEvbwMOt3MswUGXn0MCb67z/pn92ePcdp2Yv!11sWcmY= X-Complaints-To: abuse AT gte DOT net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:04:14 GMT Distribution: world Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:04:14 GMT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:21:36, "Charles Sandmann" wrote: >With the new addition of a CWSDPMI embedded stub: >Linked in is the wrong term - it's built into the stub which can be >built separately and upgraded separately from the application. The >stub copyright is very lenient - it say use for any purpose as long >as the copyright is intact. CWSDPMI built into that stub has the >same terms as the other binaries. Note: this does prevent compressing >the stub and/or CWSDPMI since copyrights are removed/obscured. OUCH! UPX dies. Now I can't distribute my own Allegro programs over Freeservers.com because it has a file size limit of 512 KB, that is, unless a way is found to build an already compressed CWSDPMI stub with copyright notices intact. Support for CWSDPMI embedded stubs will probably need to be added to UPX anyway; it'd be nice if you worked with MFXJO on this. >When I say tools I don't mean BCC Whew! >The above statement's a bad way to >put it - it was a quick news response not a legal one. I was just putting the "anal" in IANAL ;-) --