Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 07:06:43 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se (Martin Stromberg)
Message-Id: <7458-Mon09Oct2000070643+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5h
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <8rqcd0$gng$3@antares.lu.erisoft.se> (eplmst@lu.erisoft.se)
Subject: Re: strange interrupt chaining problem with keyboard interrupt
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1001005075606 DOT 3958E-100000 AT is> <8rhi12$4up$10$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com> <9003-Thu05Oct2000231854+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <8rj5td$l0o$14$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com> <7458-Fri06Oct2000114142+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <8rliej$ecd$14$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com> <8rqcd0$gng$3 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se (Martin Stromberg)
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: 8 Oct 2000 17:54:40 GMT
> 
> Shouldn't there be an "asm volatile ("popf");" after the lcall? If
> not, why not?

I think the IRET in the handler that is called will pop the flags.
That's why they are pushed in the first place.