From: "Marie-France" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: DJGPP and C++ standard Lines: 21 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Message-ID: <%vPy5.1883$C7.75408@wagner.videotron.net> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:46:25 -0400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.201.183.70 X-Complaints-To: abuse AT videotron DOT net X-Trace: wagner.videotron.net 969655419 24.201.183.70 (Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:43:39 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:43:39 EDT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hi. I haven't been around for a while (I'm posting under a friend's account). I'm starting computer engineering and the stupid teacher insists on using Visual C++ (and he only gives the assignment in a Word .doc file on the website. what a loser) Anyway, I know better :). I'm not installing a 300 meg compiler just to compile a program that solves a linear system of equations... I'll use DJGPP :) But my question is: How up to date with the latest and greatest C++ standard draft? is it as up to date as Visual C++? will I have any problem compiling C++ code for a class that doesn't even touch classes (stops at pointers) My guess is no, but I just wanted to make sure... (disclaimer: the opinions posted above are MINE, not the person's from whose account I'm posting this rant)