From: Damian Yerrick <Bullcr_pd_yerrick AT hotmail DOT comRemoveBullcr_p>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: What is faster as memcpy???
Organization: Pin Eight Software  http://pineight.8m.com/
Message-ID: <r162ss8sbeqv0f65f0bv4db9f7g6osobag@4ax.com>
References: <CCPv5.8958$l6 DOT 494172 AT zwoll1 DOT home DOT nl> <8pqfb2$hmk$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 17
X-Trace: /w3Za/bsjU9+xMtsGMfST75fgBBihrTez1LrVrRa+urq5yvsZrXth871fnyMiSL2W9HbHCVCctXa!zgryXN2q3YSNf29ymunxDuYjpuimjM+UZqzjWuuAtZGnkx7Z6s2tYgPlcnhQt7dcKMeB4yqbGNNH!dQA=
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT gte DOT net
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 22:06:18 GMT
Distribution: world
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 22:06:18 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On 14 Sep 2000 12:12:18 GMT, Hans-Bernhard Broeker
<broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> wrote:

>it's usually better to do all the manipulation operations on a RAM
>buffer, and only after completion of it, blast the whole thing to
>the framebuffer in a single large memcpy().

But what if I can get only x frames per second using a single large
memcpy()?

-- 
MS (n)  1. A debilitating and surprisingly widespread affliction
  that renders the sufferer barely able to perform the simplest
  task.  2. A disease, multiple sclerosis (see).

This is McAfee VirusScan. Add these two lines to your signature to
prevent the spread of signature viruses.  http://www.mcafee.com/