From: "Natman" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: <8n65c7$708 AT nntp DOT seflin DOT org> <39B4FA72 DOT 4943D810 AT inXSformatics DOT net> Subject: Re: Borland 4.5 C/C++ compiler problem Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 16:44:33 -0600 Lines: 44 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.148.132.126 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.148.132.126 Message-ID: <39b57742_5@news.cadvision.com> X-Trace: 5 Sep 2000 16:44:18 -0700, 207.148.132.126 Organization: CADVision Development Corporation (http://www.cadvision.com/) X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.50.1.43 Path: news.mv.net!newsfeed.mathworks.com!nntp.flash.net!nntp.cadvision.com!news.cadvision.com!207.148.132.126 Xref: news.mv.net comp.os.msdos.programmer:110141 comp.os.msdos.djgpp:103184 As far as I know "unmoveable" means that the file is in use and is "locked". Close the file that is in question and the sectors will be moveable again... (or just boot with a plain boot disk). Natman "JohnT" wrote in message news:39B4FA72 DOT 4943D810 AT inXSformatics DOT net... > > Damian Yerrick wrote: > > > On 13 Aug 2000 12:47:03 GMT, d021317c AT dc DOT seflin DOT org (Marshall Price) > > wrote: > > > > > 32 is such a *large* number! > > > Besides, I discovered DEFRAG was reporting more and more of my hard > > >drive "unmovable." When I got away from DJGPP and CWSDPMI and GO32 (or > > >*something*), I stopped having those problems. > > > > This is strange. comp.os.msdos.djgpp added > > > > -- > > Damian Yerrick > > I was browsing around comp.os.msdos.djgpp and found the problem > of parts of the disk being marked "unmoveable". I'm not sure, but > think this may be due to DOS sessions running under Windows and > getting some kind of undocumented crap written to files or clusters > by Windows. My system had two hard drives for a while, one used > as backup, and I would get rid of the unmoveable clusters by doing > a backup, reformat and copying all the files back. The exact flag > that causes the "unmoveable" designation I don't know about, but > documented file attributes don't have a bit that means "unmoveable". > Anyone got a good guess on this? > > I think one of the programs that causes this is a DOS text editor, > not part of DJGPP. > > John > >