From: Richard Dawe Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: The Future of DJGPP Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2000 21:53:02 +0100 Organization: Customer of Energis Squared Lines: 23 Message-ID: <39B168AE.3DE96F75@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> References: <967904615 DOT 832712 AT shelley DOT paradise DOT net DOT nz> <8t32rsodgkia3rk2rok5fn57vcgta55nc5 AT 4ax DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-105.americium.dialup.pol.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk 967976657 29062 62.136.67.105 (3 Sep 2000 10:24:17 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Sep 2000 10:24:17 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr Path: news.mv.net!News.Destek.net!feed-out.newsfeeds.com!newsfeeds.com!feed.newsfeeds.com!newsfeeds.com!diablo.theplanet.net!news.theplanet.net!newspost.theplanet.net!iolanthe.int.phekda.freeserve.co.uk!nobody Xref: news.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:103135 Hello! Damian Yerrick wrote: > > AndrewJ wrote: > > confusing assembler syntax > > NASM (netwide assembler), a common DJGPP addon, fixes the > "Gas-backwards" AT&T syntax. IIRC later versions of GAS can be used to fix GAS's backwards syntax - in other words, later versions support Intel syntax. > >[3] Why do 90% of my replies to you usually involve me dragging > >Watcom into it? Ugh, please, not the gcc vs. Watcom argument /again/. Bye, -- Richard Dawe [ mailto:richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com | http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/ ]