Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 09:36:06 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Message-Id: <1438-Mon14Aug2000093605+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b In-reply-to: (message from Damian Yerrick on Mon, 14 Aug 2000 05:47:33 GMT) Subject: Re: Borland 4.5 C/C++ compiler problem References: <8n65c7$708 AT nntp DOT seflin DOT org> <83sns9ughl DOT fsf AT mercury DOT bitbucket> <9743-Mon14Aug2000001848+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: Damian Yerrick > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp > Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 05:47:33 GMT > > >Too many unmovable clusters usually mean lost or cross-linked clusters > >and other similar calamities. One should run CHKDSK or SCANDISK (or > >similar tools) before running the defragger. > > According to the docs, the Windows 98 defragger checks the disk > for errors before it begins to juggle clusters. Does this count? Assuming that the docs tells the truth, yes. Note that the OP was talking about DOS, not Windows (CWSDPMI was mentioned, I believe).