From: Adam Majer Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Vs: WATCOM vs. DJGPP Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 19:00:59 -0500 Organization: The University of Manitoba Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <39874ce2 DOT 50081575 AT news DOT wins DOT uva DOT nl> <2qcgoso5cv0i6qllki9pqih2jc05ptl9n6 AT 4ax DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: merak.cc.umanitoba.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca 965433661 3280 130.179.16.10 (5 Aug 2000 00:01:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Postmaster AT cc DOT umanitoba DOT ca NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Aug 2000 00:01:01 GMT In-Reply-To: <2qcgoso5cv0i6qllki9pqih2jc05ptl9n6@4ax.com> To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > That's still no excuse for it. And AFAIK, there are no time-limited versions > of compilers. Some companies make their living on this. It takes a lot of > time and effort to write and maintain a compiler, you know. I could have had a > burned copy of WC11, but chose instead to purchase it. It made me feel good > knowing that I hard worked hard to afford it, instead of stealing it. I agree 100%. I always buy stuff and not steal it. Well, except for MS. But heck, I do not use any of their stuff if I can avoid it. :) Sincerely, Adam