Message-ID: <5337D585DDD3D111996B0008C728F07DA42A5C@PA00FSR01> From: Nick DiToro To: "'djgpp AT delorie DOT com'" Subject: RE: WATCOM vs. DJGPP Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 12:49:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01BFFB0F.3FA1CBB4" Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01BFFB0F.3FA1CBB4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" This info will help you, but Watcom is up to 11.0 and the comparison is for 10.0 http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/compila.html -----Original Message----- From: Tony [mailto:mail_box AT iobox DOT fi] Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 9:58 AM To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: WATCOM vs. DJGPP Is Watcom faster than DJGPP? Should i buy Watcom or download DJGPP. Watcom is kinda expensive and DJGPP can only compile to DOS. Suggest something.. ------_=_NextPart_001_01BFFB0F.3FA1CBB4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: WATCOM vs. DJGPP

This info will help you, but Watcom is up to 11.0 and = the comparison is for 10.0

http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/comp= ila.html


-----Original Message-----
From: Tony [mailto:mail_box AT iobox DOT fi]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 9:58 AM
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: WATCOM vs. DJGPP

Is Watcom faster than DJGPP?
Should i buy Watcom or download DJGPP.
Watcom is kinda expensive and DJGPP can only compile = to DOS.

Suggest something..




------_=_NextPart_001_01BFFB0F.3FA1CBB4--