Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 06:21:45 +0600 (LKT) From: Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel X-Sender: kalum AT roadrunner DOT grendel DOT net To: Damian Yerrick cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Djgpp dead. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Damian Yerrick spoke the following immortal words, > On 29 Jul 2000 15:58:22 GMT, lintux_doesnt_like AT spam DOT lintux DOT cx (Wilmer > van der Gaast) wrote: > > >Gur sbyybjvat jvfr jbeqf pbzr sebz Qernzre va gur Grzcyr: > >> > As DOS is now, soon Windows shall be. > >> > >> I beg to differ... Windows will never be what DOS was/is. This is just an > >> ignorant idiot with a bigger mouth than brain. > >> > >Unfortunately, Windows already is what DOS was. > > > >Not in terms of stability/etc. but in terms of popularity. (Number of users, > >that is...) > > Or you can turn it around with Windows NiceTry aka win2k: > > Not in terms of popularity (it costs $300 a seat) but in terms of > stability it has finally caught up to DOS :-) This is again a myth propagated by microsoft, remember the terms they used for NT4.0, rock-solid, never crashes, way different from windize 9x, well they are using the same marketing tricks for win2k as well. win2k has a *huge* amount of bugs, is unstable, cannot handle *huge* amounts of mail, thats why hotmail.com still use Solaris with qmail, etc.etc...Dos was/is much more stable tham *any* windoze product that I have come acroos upon... Grendel Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread :)