Message-Id: <200007081703.UAA25727@alpha.netvision.net.il>
Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 20:05:04 +0200
To: brogdon AT austin DOT rr DOT com
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <396749BE.DE96B0E2@austin.rr.com> (message from Jonathan & Sylvia
	Brogdon on Sat, 08 Jul 2000 10:33:18 -0500)
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: GDB stub for remote debugging of DJGPP targets
References: <39669600 DOT 896FFBB6 AT austin DOT rr DOT com> <200007080630 DOT JAA17055 AT mailgw1 DOT netvision DOT net DOT il> <3966CFBC DOT 3686882B AT austin DOT rr DOT com> <200007081225 DOT PAA23074 AT alpha DOT netvision DOT net DOT il> <396749BE DOT DE96B0E2 AT austin DOT rr DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 10:33:18 -0500
> From: Jonathan & Sylvia Brogdon <brogdon AT austin DOT rr DOT com>
>
> > In that case, I suggest to rename your library to some name other than
> > libgdb.a, to prevent conflicts.
> 
> Actually, I don't believe that any of the GDB distributions to date
> produces a libgdb.a.

The latest GDB release, GDB 5.0, actually builds libgdb.a and then
links against it to get gdb.exe.  This is indeed a change relative to
previous GDB releases.