From: Radical NetSurfer <radsmail AT juno DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Snippets in DJGPP HELP!
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 19:00:48 -0400
Message-ID: <n890ksgllmpjblmpddf9e1p3mqkq20b7ni@4ax.com>
References: <2hstjskfhb0vq7b2so1bgpc62rgd9s1imu AT 4ax DOT com> <01bfd245$2187fd80$76247d81 AT default>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.202.134.206
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.202.134.206
X-Trace: 8 Jun 2000 19:01:52 -0400, 216.202.134.206
Lines: 27
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.31.79.51
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Are you kidding me?
Why on earth would you want to wade through 1000's (okay 
thats a conservative estimate granted) of C/C++ source code
libraries, when placing them into a SINGLE LIBRARY
ARCHIVE relieves you of all that trouble?!?!?

Eventually... I'll simplyt add / remove modules until it does
archive... I know for a fact I don't need everything anyways
:-)

On 8 Jun 2000 18:53:42 GMT, "doug" <deleveld AT dds DOT nl> wrote:

[snip]
>Because portable makefiles are hard/impossible
>to write.
>
[snip]
>That's not how the snippets are usually used.
>Just pull the code out and use it in your programs.
>The files are usually small enough to do this.
>Compiling as a lib is (i think) the hard way to do things.
                         ===                    =================
>
>Good luck,
>
>Doug