From: buers AT gmx DOT de (Dieter Buerssner)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: windows version of Crafty
Date: 25 May 2000 13:50:33 GMT
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <8gjie4.3vvquht.0@buerssner-17104.user.cis.dfn.de>
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0005232006280 DOT 458-100000 AT roadrunner DOT grendel DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pec-143-66.tnt9.s2.uunet.de (149.225.143.66)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 959262633 1458611 149.225.143.66 (16 [17104])
X-Posting-Agent: Hamster/1.3.13.0
User-Agent: Xnews/03.02.04
To: djgpp AT Delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote:

>Maybe using -march=i586 which would produce code which uses i586
>insns might make it run faster.... 

It will make almost no difference (I am using -march=k6). My experience 
with gcc and all those switches is: after -O (and possibly -fomit-frame-
pointer) you won't get much for a complicated program with a flat profile. 
What helps one function hurts the other.

-- 
Dieter Buerssner