From: Damian Yerrick Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: System function Organization: Pin Eight Software http://pineight.8m.com/ Message-ID: References: <39190753 DOT 529E894D AT st DOT com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 28 X-Trace: /KHlxNhqmxvZeerQzJA+sTFOvEEKLuz4X9RuF6tPp6dXPAm29dmDNhPP6IDx/FHIjRyjBC1I6T1b!Wt7BriihEiRoEisshNherZioEspSAg3H+o6Z+K13uvxX4MwFR1cKM5EX9KFFlqvKczlMSbGykfGh!JbHAr/E= X-Complaints-To: abuse AT gte DOT net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 13:08:20 GMT Distribution: world Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 13:08:20 GMT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com On Wed, 10 May 2000 08:06:51 GMT, "AndrewJ" wrote: >> I use a compiler composed of many subprograms: preprocessor, >> assembler, optimizer, peephole... This is not DJGPP. >Well, I'm going to assume you're -not- talking about DJGPP, since the >optimization code is integrated directly into the compiler. That leads me to >this question: why are you posting this in the DJGPP newsgroup? It's a wee bit >off-topic. > [snip] > >If you can't use these, then I recommend you either complain to the >vendor about limited functionality, or switch to a better/different >compiler... like DJGPP maybe? ;) Sounds like the OP is writing his own compiler using DJGPP. -- Damian Yerrick "I refuse to listen to those who refuse to listen to reason." See the whole sig: http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~yerricde/sig.html This is McAfee VirusScan. Add these two lines to your signature to prevent the spread of signature viruses. http://www.mcafee.com/