From: buers AT gmx DOT de (Dieter Buerssner)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: inline asm problem
Date: 7 May 2000 10:24:35 GMT
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <8f3nia.3vvqkld.0@buerssner-17104.user.cis.dfn.de>
References: <007f01bfb76e$0020d320$2f5293c3 AT pkcrone> <8f1t7r DOT 3vs63bt DOT 0 AT buerssner-17104 DOT user DOT cis DOT dfn DOT de> <3914698C DOT C93ED6D1 AT mtu-net DOT ru>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pec-142-139.tnt9.s2.uunet.de (149.225.142.139)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 957695075 10476763 149.225.142.139 (16 [17104])
X-Posting-Agent: Hamster/1.3.13.0
User-Agent: Xnews/03.02.04
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Alexei A. Frounze wrote:

>Dieter Buerssner wrote:
>> There is a change in the handling of inline assembly in recent
>> versions of gcc. You are not allowed anymore, to put registers
>> in the input-list into the clobber list
>
>I noticed that... But should I just leave it as is or I need to redesign
>inline ASM? 

This is a strange question. It sounds like:
My code doesn't compile without errors. Should I change the code?
My code doesn't work. Should I change the code?

I think, it is not difficult to find an answer to your question ...
If you want to use recent versions of gcc, you haven't got an
alternative.

-- 
Dieter Buerssner