From: "Alexandre Devaure" <Alexandre DOT Devaure AT leroy-autom DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <8AyN4.3395$fv3 DOT 5373032 AT nnrp6 DOT proxad DOT net> <8e6f79$99u$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE>
Subject: Re: attribute stdcall
Lines: 22
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Message-ID: <iuCN4.2132$y23.4530267@nnrp5.proxad.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 13:50:06 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.51.236.59
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT proxad DOT net
X-Trace: nnrp5.proxad.net 956757006 194.51.236.59 (Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:50:06 CEST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:50:06 CEST
Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> a écrit dans le
message : 8e6f79$99u$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE...
> Alexandre Devaure <Alexandre DOT Devaure AT leroy-autom DOT com> wrote:
> > Has sombody ever had compilation problem with a function declared with
the
> > attribute stdcall with gcc 2.95?
>
> I've never used anything of this, but from looking at the error
> messages you show, I'd try adding the __attribute((stdcall)) to the
> function implementation. That attribute becomes part of the 'type' of
> the function, so it's no big surprise that the compiler complains if
> the implementation doesn't use the exact same type as the prototype
> declaration.

Yes, I need to add the attribute to the function implementation. Thing that
wasn't necessary with the gcc 2.8 and isn't say in the doc.

thanks for all,
Alex