Message-ID: <38FABF19.EA155238@mtu-net.ru> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 11:36:57 +0400 From: "Alexei A. Frounze" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii , djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Help with Inline ASM... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Recipient: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote: > > > Damian Yerrick wrote: > > > Wasn't the "flat model" discussed before here? I think we called > > > DJGPP's model a "32-bit tiny model." > > > > Well, what's the actual difference of these terms in your opinion? > > Damian refers to the same discussion I mentioned earlier in this thread. > In that discussion, the differences between these terms were beaten to > death, several times. > > In addition, I explained, again, why DJGPP's memory model is not flat > in this thread yesterday. We will never reach the end of this discussion. Let's just give up with it. How you call DJGPP's memory model doesn't affect my code and how I call it doesn't affect yours. I'm stopping this thread, since we have not reached common conclusion and that's not a serious subject to talk about. bye. Alexei A. Frounze ----------------------------------------- Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru Mirror: http://members.xoom.com/alexfru