Sender: root AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <38F32210.FE26F51B@inti.gov.ar> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:01:05 -0300 From: salvador Organization: INTI X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.38 i686) X-Accept-Language: es-AR, en, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem References: <38F20E7A DOT 3330E9A4 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <38F23A21 DOT A59621A1 AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <38F2AA36 DOT 33206DD9 AT mtu-net DOT ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com "Alexei A. Frounze" wrote: > salvador wrote: > > > Is it a normal thing, if one instruction that adds something to ESP(or EBP) is > > > followed by sutracting instruction that works with the same register? > > > > ? > > When it discards ESP change after a call to subroutine and plus sometimes one > extra add/sub. But they could be combined altogether to the only one > instruction. These things are combined by the optimization. > > > an error encounters: > > > "Error: Error: Missing ')' assumed" > > > "Error: Error: Ignoring junk `(%ebp))' after expression")? > > > W/o the -O2 switch it's compiled fine. Isn't it a little bit strange? > > > > Can you show a small example? I guess that's an error in your inline assembler > > code, but I can't know without the actual code. > > 21KB of a C file that depends on 3 other modules. :)) Preprocess it (using -E) and send the preprocessed output. > I'll try. But I don't know what's wrong, since it _is_ compiled normally w/o -O > switch. Strange thingy. Not so much, I had these kind of problems, and was my fault ;-) SET -- Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer) Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft or http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/ Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org set AT ieee DOT org set-soft AT bigfoot DOT com Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA Phone: +(5411) 4759 0013