From: "Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH]" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.programmer Subject: Re: Detecting Windows and Windows directory from DOS Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:36:04 -0500 Organization: Nortel Networks Lines: 14 Message-ID: <38D90484.52A8FACC@americasm01.nt.com> References: <8am5ub$o0v$1 AT news6 DOT svr DOT pol DOT co DOT uk> <38D108E3 DOT D9821E3B AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com> <8arkm8$m3h$1 AT newsg2 DOT svr DOT pol DOT co DOT uk> <38D1EFAA DOT 7A48D29D AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <38D6844B DOT 876E5631 AT bigfoot DOT com> <38D7E5F5 DOT ED6FB969 AT bigfoot DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: wmerh0tk.ca.nortel.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72C-CCK-MCD [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/785) X-Accept-Language: en To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Richard Dawe wrote: > By the way, I think you mean "in user code they _may_ lead to undefined > behavior" rather than "in user code they lead to undefined behavior", > which is a bit harsh. ;) Those 2 statements have the same meaning. Just because an action is 'undefined', does not mean that it can't perform some known action. -- (\/) Rolf Campbell (\/)