Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 14:16:08 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "nimrod a. abing" <synflood AT eudoramail DOT com>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: rm -d and mangled fat entries
In-Reply-To: <DJCCODJBLHIFAAAA@shared1-mail.whowhere.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000309141543.1851G-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, nimrod a. abing wrote:

> Too bad there isn't a DJGPP port.
> 
> Q: Will there be an fsck port for DJGPP?
>    If not, plz explain why.

I don't think fsck can be ``ported'' to DJGPP, since the filesystems
supported by DJGPP are totally different from Unix filesystems.

But there's no official DJGPP policy on what should be ported, so if
someone has motivation, by all means go ahead.