From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: possible bug in DJGPP gdb build Date: 3 Mar 2000 14:28:48 GMT Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH) Lines: 17 Message-ID: <89oi70$fke$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE> References: <38BDD2A7 DOT 7DD8B76A AT caresystems DOT com DOT au> <83em9tuqb5 DOT fsf AT mercury DOT st DOT hmc DOT edu> <38BEE872 DOT FC77655E AT caresystems DOT com DOT au> NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 952093728 16014 137.226.32.75 (3 Mar 2000 14:28:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Mar 2000 14:28:48 GMT User-Agent: tin/1.4-19991113 ("No Labels") (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.0 (i586)) Originator: broeker@ To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com leon wrote: > Nate Eldredge wrote: >> [snip] >> >> It's a known limitation in DJGPP. See FAQ section 12.8. If you >> compile with -gstabs, this should go away. > thanks to Eli and Nate - i will try that - in the meantime just wanted > to say that i compiled the thing with -ggdb option and that also > appeared to solve the problem... -ggdb implies -gstabs. At least for current DJGPP releases of binutils and gcc. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.