From: Damian Yerrick Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Allegro Compile...how long? Organization: Pin Eight Software http://pineight.8m.com/ Message-ID: References: <951826539 DOT 12735 DOT 0 DOT nnrp-04 DOT c2de8b1c AT news DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 27 X-Trace: /K49oEjRMBhAxZ/ghSWno3OBK4VGdGP5xHbSn9XqLGH0wcbsVsOZGCJPvjxWE/R1v+N7I2tXMxI7!hSCFG/x6zuowbAPlmdC3RyxZqRVzaYYNQx4dVP2Pp8EH5GJRUvquUWRdLpaQmRmZpJWV9XE9e28i!hi6F X-Complaints-To: abuse AT gte DOT net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 04:52:46 GMT Distribution: world Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 04:52:46 GMT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com On Tue, 29 Feb 2000 12:10:59 -0000, "dolores" wrote: >Is the Allegro compile supposed to take a long time? Yes. It's a big library. How long do _you_ think it should take for a good optimizing compiler such as GCC to crunch multimegabytes of source? >I have a P3 500 and its already been 1/2 hour. Is your hard drive thrashing when trying to compile in pure DOS? If so, press Ctrl+C to pause the make and run C:\DJGPP\ALLEGRO>smartdrv c+ to start a disk cache. Then resume the build: C:\DJGPP\ALLEGRO>make GCC is a lot faster on Linux, with its smarter disk cache. -- Damian Yerrick http://yerricde.tripod.com/ Comment on story ideas: http://home1.gte.net/frodo/quickjot.html AOL is sucks! Find out why: http://anti-aol.org/faqs/aas/ View full sig: http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~yerricde/sig.html This is McAfee VirusScan. Add these two lines to your .sig to prevent the spread of .sig viruses. http://www.mcafee.com/