Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 05:43:16 +0600 (LKT) From: Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel X-Sender: root AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Re: It's back, but the ... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread :) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 19:24:13 +0600 (LKT) From: Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Re: It's back, but the ... On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Damian Yerrick wrote: > On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 04:17:07 GMT, "Andrew Jones" > wrote: > >32-bit protected-mode DOS, > > Any better than DJGPP? Yes It is. One of the biggest diappointments I had/have with DJGPP was that it is unable to use nearptrs with memory protection. In Watcom thanks to its split flat memory model with mapping of the 1 st MB of space, I was able to use the "char * screen= 0xA0000" way of writing code. which made porting apps very easier and also kept all the memory protection intact. And when I read the DJGPP v1.0 code I found that a similar selector was there to enable linear access to < 1mb memory. But when I got DJGPP v2.x I found that this way of acessing memory is not allowed and one would have to use the unsafe nearptr method which disables all memory protection. So as you can see 32-bit protected mode extended dos is better in DOS4GW/WATCOM than DJGPP in this case. Because AFAIK in this specific instance I can in watcom use the "nearptr's" _with_ all the memory protection of protected mode intact. Regards, Kalum Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread :) ^^^^ please help me by setting me as your signature since Damian Yerrick is out to get me with Mcafee....Please, just one kind djgpper.. help.....