Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 11:05:26 +0500 (MVT)
From: Prashant TR <prashant_tr AT yahoo DOT com>
X-Sender: prashant_tr AT midpec DOT com
To: Maurice Lombardi <Maurice DOT Lombardi AT ujf-grenoble DOT fr>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: virtual memory exhausted
In-Reply-To: <3895FFC3.21B90C7@ujf-grenoble.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002010922520.471-100000@midpec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by delorie.com id AAA00396
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Maurice Lombardi wrote:

> Wilmer van der Gaast a écrit :
> > 
> > On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 21:59:41 +0100, Maurice Lombardi wrote:
> > > I do (I just have a new PC with 512k)
> > A _new_ PC with only 512 KiloBytes of memory??? A typo, maybe?
> 
> Yes 512 Mb

AFAIK, CWSDPMI r5 does support more than 128M RAM. This seems to be the
major improvement. What Charles probably meant was that large amounts of
memory like 512M when used will slow down the performance of CWSDPMI
considerably.