Sender: root AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <38722978.6D1582E3@inti.gov.ar>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 14:10:16 -0300
From: salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization: INTI
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.38 i686)
X-Accept-Language: es-AR, en, es
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Why did ID choose DJGPP for Quake?
References: <94622644001 AT out DOT newmail DOT net> <BCna4.65265$X47 DOT 355046 AT quark DOT idirect DOT com> <386A476B DOT C5F9209A AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <84gsav$bfh$3 AT lure DOT pipex DOT net> <387098AB DOT 97CDE287 AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <84t0mq$iq6$1 AT soap DOT pipex DOT net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Stephen Howe wrote:

> salvador wrote in message <387098AB DOT 97CDE287 AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>...
>
> >> I have looked at that. They are using 10.0a, hardly the newest version of
> >> Watcom C/C++. It would be better to do a comparison using 10.6 or 11.0b.
> I
> >> would be interested to know what switches they used.
> >
> >I have an article from BYTE, they compared 10.0a and 11.0 and both delivers
> the
> >almost the same performance.
> >And they used the best switches they could found. In fact BYTE coded the
> >benchmarks with Watcom in mind as the DOS compiler because they used the
> >benchmarks to compare computers.
>
> I would like to see that article. Do you have a URL?

Nope, lamentably is on paper.

SET

--
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
                    set AT ieee DOT org set-soft AT bigfoot DOT com
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA Phone: +(5411) 4759 0013