Sender: root AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <387098AB.97CDE287@inti.gov.ar>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2000 09:40:11 -0300
From: salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization: INTI
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.38 i686)
X-Accept-Language: es-AR, en, es
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Why did ID choose DJGPP for Quake?
References: <94622644001 AT out DOT newmail DOT net> <BCna4.65265$X47 DOT 355046 AT quark DOT idirect DOT com> <386A476B DOT C5F9209A AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <84gsav$bfh$3 AT lure DOT pipex DOT net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Stephen Howe wrote:

> >>Take a look at http://www.geocities.com/set-soft/compila.html
> >>You'll get a big surprise.
>
> I have looked at that. They are using 10.0a, hardly the newest version of
> Watcom C/C++. It would be better to do a comparison using 10.6 or 11.0b. I
> would be interested to know what switches they used.

I have an article from BYTE, they compared 10.0a and 11.0 and both delivers the
almost the same performance.
And they used the best switches they could found. In fact BYTE coded the
benchmarks with Watcom in mind as the DOS compiler because they used the
benchmarks to compare computers.

SET

--
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
                    set AT ieee DOT org set-soft AT bigfoot DOT com
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA Phone: +(5411) 4759 0013