From: alainm AT news DOT RISQ DOT QC DOT CA (Alain Magloire)
Subject: Re: djgpp strangeness
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <tmU74.34$Fc6 DOT 1542 AT weber DOT videotron DOT net> <14684.897$Qz2 DOT 16629 AT wagner DOT videotron DOT net> <Yue84.371$36 DOT 7194 AT carnaval DOT risq DOT qc DOT ca> <38618321 DOT 667C7F69 AT a DOT crl DOT com> <iis84.536$36 DOT 12170 AT carnaval DOT risq DOT qc DOT ca> <386279D6 DOT 61CBA599 AT a DOT crl DOT com>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <00v84.595$36.13627@carnaval.risq.qc.ca>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 19:48:12 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 132.206.63.174
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT mcgill DOT ca
X-Trace: carnaval.risq.qc.ca 945978492 132.206.63.174 (Thu, 23 Dec 1999 14:48:12 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 14:48:12 EST
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Weiqi Gao (weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com) wrote:
: Alain Magloire wrote:
: > 
: > No, that is not my point, the point is malloc()/free() will not
: > call the constructor or destructor of a class, reread the post.

: I understand you perfectly: calling malloc()/free() will not call
: constructors and destructors.  What I'm saying is that that may not be
: enough to explain the bug.

oops, I did sound a little harsh, sorry 'bout that.
And for the other poster code, seeing how he mixes stuff (C vs C++)
etc ...  there is probaly many other things waiting to break.

--
au revoir, alain
----
Aussi haut que l'on soit assis, on est toujours assis que sur son cul !!!