From: "beat studer" <beat_studer AT freesurf DOT ch>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Size
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 21:06:01 +0100
Organization: sunrise communications ag
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <82mdri$c49$1@news1.sunrise.ch>
References: <XQj34.344$nx1 DOT 17835 AT wagner DOT videotron DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pop-ls-8-1-2-dialup-42.freesurf.ch
X-Trace: news1.sunrise.ch 944683698 12425 194.230.231.42 (8 Dec 1999 20:08:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sunrise DOT ch
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Dec 1999 20:08:18 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
To: djgpp AT Delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Making a final build with the -s option reduces size considerably. If you
run a program with a DOS-Shell and look at the memory (e.g.  with 'mem /c')
you'll find that only a relatively small portion is loaded into memory (e.g.
100 kb file-size vs. 17 kb in memory).

Valkir <jfd50 AT videotron DOT ca> wrote in message
news:XQj34.344$nx1 DOT 17835 AT wagner DOT videotron DOT net...
> How can I optimize my config so the size isn't that huge?
>
> Now if I do something like
>
> void main(){}
>
> it take 86k... something wrong I know :o)
>
> It does that with rhide and gcc...
>
> help me someone? thanks a lot
>
>