Message-ID: <000801bf3367$5549a100$0100a8c0@terminator> From: "Jochen Palmer" To: Subject: AT&T assembler PLEASE HELP Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 15:55:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF336F.B6663040" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF336F.B6663040 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everyone !=20 I have a litte syntax problem using DJGPP with AT&T inline assembler. = Everytime I use instructions such as popfd and pushfd I get the = following compiler message:=20 Error: no such 386 instruction: 'pushfd'.=20 But that's not true. I know I have to use a diffrent syntax fot AT&T = assembler compared to Intel assembler, but what should I use instead of = 'popfd' ? 'shr' for example worked without problems.=20 Help is appreciated. Thanks in advance.=20 Jochen jpalmer AT myokay DOT net ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF336F.B6663040 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello everyone !=20

I have a litte syntax problem using DJGPP with AT&T inline = assembler.=20 Everytime I use instructions such as popfd and pushfd I get the = following=20 compiler message:=20

Error: no such 386 instruction: 'pushfd'.=20

But that's not true. I know I have to use a diffrent syntax fot = AT&T=20 assembler compared to Intel assembler, but what should I use instead of = 'popfd'=20 ? 'shr' for example worked without problems.=20

Help is appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

Jochen

jpalmer AT myokay DOT net

------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF336F.B6663040--