Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 09:30:48 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Adam Schrotenboer <ajschrotenboer AT lycosmail DOT com>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gprof and __dpmi_int
In-Reply-To: <3830CBE6.D44CAA76@lycosmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.991116093030.6671K-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:

> Still, it would perhaps be useful to be able to tell gprof to ignore
> this fxn, since it is only useful if file I/O is the actual bottleneck.

If you need this, there is already a switch to tell Gprof to ignore
certain functions.  It's in the docs.