From: JeLlyFish DOT software AT gmx DOT net (Vinzent Hoefler)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: return type for `main' changed to `int'
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 18:48:14 GMT
Organization: JeLlyFish software
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <7ud5n4$sht$1@news00.btx.dtag.de>
References: <84EFC73E5BDD300C DOT 85A7FCC32BD1270B DOT F7CB654E8161FA9A AT lp DOT airnews DOT net> <380a163a AT news DOT xenologics DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news00.btx.dtag.de 940186148 29245 777000109768-0001 991017 18:49:08
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT t-online DOT de
X-Sender: 777000109768-0001 AT t-dialin DOT net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/16.235
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Oliver Roese" <oroese AT edina DOT xnc DOT com> wrote:

>  implementations shall allow both of the following definitions of main:
>          int main() { /* ... */ }
>  and
>          int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { /* ... */ }
[...]
>According to this, you were right to report this warning as an anomaly for a cpp-program.

Sorry, but the warning is correct. He did define "void main()" and
that's neither correct C nor C++.


Vinzent.