Message-ID: <38089DED.89DB35D0@surfree.net.il>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 17:46:53 +0200
From: Borja Aranovic <spile_nomaed AT surfree DOT net DOT il>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: RHIDE (was: How to create a library?)
References: <37fbec82 DOT 15713264 AT news DOT linuxfr DOT org> <7th0q6$e2b$1 AT solomon DOT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu> <37fe17b2 DOT 3171963 AT news DOT linuxfr DOT org> <7tlo65$70j$1 AT solomon DOT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.3.194.145
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.3.194.145
X-Trace: 16 Oct 1999 17:46:34 +0200, 212.3.194.145
Lines: 32
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Damian Yerrick wrote:

> dodger <dodger AT softhome DOT net> wrote:
>
> >>> Learning C++ is time consuming enough, but trying to
> >>> learn how to use compilers often seems like a daunting
> >>> task.  (The bulk of my programming experience is with
> >>> all-in-one development enviroments.)
>
> Damian Yerrick <web DOT poison AT pineight DOT 8m DOT com> wrote:
>
> >> All-in-one development environments like RHIDE?
>
> dodger:
>
> > In principle, yes.  The IDE's (I purposefully did not use that term
> > because I meant IDE's that actually hide compiler control- not just
> > any IDE) I'm used to are Visual Basic and some Turbo/Visual C++.
>
> So you've used Borland C++.
>
> > I've tried RHIDE.  I find it to be somewhat lacking and very
> > unintuitive (for me).
>
> Why? It's just like Borland's.

Execualy, I mean, it's execualy the same, If you don't wanna use any
Advanced options as screen-resolutions and etc., so you use it execualy
as Borland's.