Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 12:30:54 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Prashant TR <prashant_news AT yahoo DOT com>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: djgpp's equivalent of _dos_getvect() and _dos_setvect() ??
In-Reply-To: <19991002121709.11610.rocketmail@web1402.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.991003123043.16555X-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Prashant TR wrote:

> --- "Lars S. Loevlie" <larssl AT online DOT no> wrote:
> > I'm wondering if you people could tell me if djgpp
> > has an equivalent
> > to the functions _dos_getvect() and _dos_setvect() ?
> 
> _go32_dpmi_get_real_mode_interrupt_vector() and
> _go32_dpmi_set_real_mode_interrupt_vector().

The functions that get and set the protected-mode interrupt handler
are a much better candidate for a reply to this question (since
hardware interrupts such as the keyboard are always reflected to
protected mode).