From: "Damian Yerrick" <web DOT poison AT pineight DOT 8m DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Standalone EXEs
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 13:15:45 -0500
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <7t09g4$i7m$1@solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu>
References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 19990930175310 DOT 00799570 AT tavultesoft DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.112.103.81
X-Trace: solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu 938715460 18678 137.112.103.81 (30 Sep 1999 18:17:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news AT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Sep 1999 18:17:40 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Andrew Durdin <andy AT tavultesoft DOT com> wrote in message
news:3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 19990930175310 DOT 00799570 AT tavultesoft DOT com...
> Is there any way I can create an EXE that doesn't need the separate
> CWSDPMI.EXE??

Not yet.

Mr. Sandmann, would you mind working on this?
Perhaps write a stub that includes CWSDPMI?