From: dscott AT networkusa DOT net (SCOTT19U.ZIP_GUY)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Crypt() - CAST
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 05:18:20 GMT
Organization: Retired Electronic Engineer and  Y2K expert
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <7suob2$pti$2@news.gate.net>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990929101345 DOT 11087G-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-69.elpasonet.net
X-Trace: news.gate.net 938665122 26546 216.84.6.98 (30 Sep 1999 04:18:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT gate DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Sep 1999 04:18:42 GMT
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.01
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990929101345 DOT 11087G-100000 AT is>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com wrote:
>
>On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, SCOTT19U.ZIP_GUY wrote:
>
>>   Actaully there are many C codings of encryption methods out on
>> the net. But many don't work with DJGPP with out special tuning.
>
>Why is that?  What is special about DJGPP or the encryption code that 
>they don't live well together?

   The reason is that for encryption you get closer to the machine.
And even with the same machine you don't find compliers useing the
same word size. I have yet to hear from any one getting scott19u.zip
my encryption program to ran on another machine besides the PC.
Take a look at it.



David A. Scott
--
                    SCOTT19U.ZIP NOW AVAILABLE WORLD WIDE
                    http://www.jim.com/jamesd/Kong/scott19u.zip
                    http://members.xoom.com/ecil/index.htm
                    NOTE EMAIL address is for SPAMERS