From: Richard Dawe Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: OT? Martin S (Re: gcc optimizes divisons!) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 19:59:08 +0100 Organization: Customer of Planet Online Lines: 18 Message-ID: <37EFBE7C.67E2230@tudor21.net> References: <37e37095 AT news DOT xenologics DOT com> <7sn7mv$sqc$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-28.tretinoin.dialup.pol.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news8.svr.pol.co.uk 938553999 8677 62.136.90.28 (28 Sep 1999 21:26:39 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Sep 1999 21:26:39 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.10 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr X-NNTP-Posting-Host: iolanthe.tudor21.net To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hello. Martin Stromberg wrote: > While the o with dots is correct (nice one), o-umlaut isn't. It's a > letter in its own right in Swedish (although it is the same glyph(?): > ö). I seem to remember my German teacher telling me that an umlaut and the symbol with two dots (whose name eludes me) were different. The two-dots symbol is used in Zoe on the 'e', which is a different sound in German to an umlaut, which should be written as two vertical lines IIRC. Are there any Germans in the Haus who can confirm this? Bye, -- Richard Dawe richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com ICQ 47595498 http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/