Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 16:02:51 -0400
Message-ID: <vines.y929+fpwvrA@ptltest1.phoenix.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
To: <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
From: <ms AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Undeliverable Message
X-Incognito-SN: 258
X-Incognito-Version: 5.0.1.93
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id QAA23730
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

To:            SMTP AT PTLTEST1@Servers[<djgpp AT delorie DOT com>]
Cc:            
Subject:       Re: problem with new malloc.c attn: Michael Bukin & Eli Zaretsk

Message not delivered to recipients below.  Press F1 for help with VNM
error codes.               

	VNM3045:  johnny_chan AT phoenix DOT com



Unable to find error information for this error.
----------------------  Original Message Follows  ----------------------

SUBJECT too long. Original SUBJECT is
Re: problem with new malloc.c attn: Michael Bukin & Eli Zaretskii


----------------------  Original Message Follows  ----------------------

     When I try adding the line
             zvector &operatorto my definition of class zvector I get error messages which I am unable
to use due to lack of knowledge.
     Rather than dealing with the intracacies of overloading the
assignment operator, I can overload the operator < and use it as an
assignment operator.  I add the overload
         void operator<(zvector w8,zvector w9)
             {int zi;
              for (zingth+1;zi++)
                {w8.s[zi+1]             }
just below the overload of operator+ and then write
         g<e+f; //instead of gï;
and     
         g<f+e;  //instead of gþ;
and that all goes fine SO LONG AS I delete the destructor ~zvector
in the definition of class zvector and also the definition of ~zvector.
In other words, everything is as before.
     I know that it is a ridiculous request, but I would like to know
how to overload operatorproblem.  I understand that my code contains some error which, as
both of you have pointed out, arises from the properties of free.
Please write out the correct code for me--it is only a few lines.
The overloading of operatorthat.