Message-Id: <m11TRNN-000VJbC@ilsa.franken.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 16:58:37 +0200 (CEST)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
From: Michael Uplawski <uplawski AT sulla DOT franken DOT de>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: conio.h
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In Reply-To: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990921145950 DOT 19568E-100000 AT is>

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> No. But as I am a NEWBIE, there is more need for basic features than
>> the latest achievements.

>I don't understand what that means.  Are you saying that conio.h in
>the DJGPP library lacks something?  If so, what?

No.
Thank you for your message. Where does those misunderstandings
originate? Was my first posting so badly put?
I do not have (i.e. _did_ not have) any conio.h among my
header-files. But, as my djgpp-version is not the newest and because
I got it from a CD, it could well be truncated some way.

No sweat. I have the file now.

>> I just do not want to download the whole package because of one single
>> missing header-file.

>The DJGPP Web site has a page where you can download individual files:

I did not know that.

>     http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/dl/ofc/

>(This URL is in the FAQ, btw; see section 4.5.)

Thank you. But English is not my mother language. "Files to download"
did not point me to "missing header-files". In the actual case,
finding the answer in the FAQ is rather not practicable.

As another reader of the group already sent me a version of conio.h,
the problem does no longer exist and I can only thank you again for
your interest in the matter. Believe me: I read the FAQ, I even
_use_ it. There are situations when any other solution is quicker
or more economic (in whichever way).

Bye,

Michael.