From: eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se (Martin Stromberg)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: ASM dans DJGPP
Date: 8 Sep 1999 14:44:53 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Erisoft AB, Sweden
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <7r5sp5$8ja$2@antares.lu.erisoft.se>
References: <7r3epu$8cg$1 AT wanadoo DOT fr> <37D579D6 DOT 2430AF94 AT hmc DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: propus-144.lu.erisoft.se
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Nate Eldredge (neldredge AT hmc DOT edu) wrote:
: Well, I don't speak French, but here's what Babelfish
: (http://babelfish.altavista.digital.com) made of that:

: Can you one compile command ASM appellée in a C++ source with Nasm on
: DJGPP. Because the ASM of DJGPP is enough bizard. A+ Mathieu 

: I assume from context "appellée" = "inline".

: And my response:

: Not practically.  There is a project to let NASM be used as GCC's back
: end, but it doesn't work completely.  So if you want to use inline
: assembler, you're essentially stuck with GAS and the AT&T syntax for
: now.

: You can, of course, write entire functions with NASM and link them in
: afterward.

: And my response translated into French by Babelfish (beware, French
: speakers, it's probably incomprehensible, hilarious, or both):

: Et ma réponse traduite en Français par Babelfish (prenez garde, les
: haut-parleurs français, il est probablement incompréhensible, hilare, ou
: tous deux): 

: Pas pratiquement. Il y a un projet laissent NASM être utilisé car GCC's
: soutiennent l'extrémité, mais cela ne fonctionne pas complètement. Ainsi
: si vous voulez utiliser l'assembleur intégré, vous êtes essentiellement
: coincés avec le GAZ et la syntaxe d'cAt&t pour maintenant.

: Vous pouvez, naturellement, écrire des fonctions entières avec NASM et
: les joindre dedans après. 

: (Hmm... I tried retranslating it and it makes partial sense, but only
: partial mind you.  :)

Well it did a good job on the translation sentence. However compiling and
Babelfish don't seem to mix.

I particularly enjoyed the translation of "GAS" to "GAZ".


Right,

							MartinS