From: "Outsider (6.22/3.11)" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: WARNING: DOS is about to die. Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 18:05:18 +0200 Organization: none Message-ID: <37D3E63E.E81155D7@aol.com> References: <7quo1t$94k$1 AT solomon DOT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu> <37D2EEE8 DOT CF27908C AT a DOT crl DOT com> <37D34350 DOT 2F2EE49B AT videotron DOT ca> <37D3456E DOT 448F01AF AT aol DOT com> <37D3D2E6 DOT 660F1586 AT unb DOT ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: ip18.boanxr11.ras.tele.dk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.inet.tele.dk 936633819 9061 195.249.234.18 (6 Sep 1999 16:03:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Department of Abuse NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Sep 1999 16:03:39 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (Win16; I) Lines: 53 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Endlisnis wrote: > > "Outsider (6.22/3.11)" wrote: > > > Trancelucid wrote: > > > > > > It's been quite a while that MS announced Millenium as their last Win9x > > > kernel.. but I find ironic people freaking out saying DOS is gonna die > > > when MS releases a new version... In no way we are obligated to buy each > > > and every release of their software.. > > Not everyone is so fortunate. Most people are forced to use > > whatever their employer forces onto them; usually the latest > > MS offerings. > > Well, I would say that most employers never made the jump to Win98, > they've already jumped to NT if they aren't using 95 anymore. > > The only things that don't work under NT are SVGA and LFN's (the latter of > which could be fixed, but not trivially). If LFN's are no longer available, > DJGPP _might_ decide to stop supporting them and just use the 8.3 standard to > make it work under Win2xxx or whatever. Besides that, who uses Allegro at > work anyways? Allegro is mostly a game programming language, and I doubt most > people here are using Allegro at work to program games, and if they are, then > their employer will likely stay with a platform that supports development of > DOS games. Actually there are a lot of things broken in NT's emulated DOS, which work in real DOS or even Win 4.x DOS. I haven't compiled a list, but here are a few things that come to mind. I haven't tested these myself because I don't use NT, but as reported by others these no longer work, and this is only the tip of the iceberg. REM |CHOICE /CY /TY,5 >nul REM >0bytefil @ECHO OFF ::input.bat ECHO Type input (no spaces) and press [Enter]. FC.EXE CON NUL /LB1 /N |DATE |FIND.EXE "1:">setinput.bat CLS ECHO SET INPUT=%%5> ENTER.BAT CALL SETINPUT.BAT DEL SETINPUT.BAT IF "%INPUT%"=="" GOTO END ECHO Input was %INPUT% :END FOR %%F IN (setinput.bat enter.bat) DO IF EXIST %%F DEL %%F I guess I should have been collecting all the broken items. Then I could have presented a formidible list. Regards, Outsider