From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Solved! (Re: Pentium "General Protection Fault") Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 10:53:46 +0300 Organization: NetVision Israel Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <7qhbnp$3rp$1 AT samba DOT rahul DOT net> <7qja6k$gi4$1 AT samba DOT rahul DOT net> <7qjgcl$hmt$1 AT samba DOT rahul DOT net> NNTP-Posting-Host: is.elta.co.il Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: news.netvision.net.il 936258755 28145 199.203.121.2 (2 Sep 1999 07:52:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Sep 1999 07:52:35 GMT X-Sender: eliz AT is In-Reply-To: <7qjgcl$hmt$1@samba.rahul.net> To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 1 Sep 1999, to comp.os.msdos.djgpp wrote: > One solution is to replace all references to global symbol "freelist" > in your code with something else, or make "freelist" static. If you > don't have global symbol "freelist", then, IIRC, there are other > global symbols defined in malloc. All of the symbols defined in malloc (except `malloc' itself, `free' and `realloc') are static in current development sources. So these problems will go away when v2.03 is released.